BadAim Posted July 22, 2009 Author Posted July 22, 2009 LOL, I often wonder if a three digit IQ might not be a good requirement for the purchase of any kind of firearm. Quote
BadAim Posted July 22, 2009 Author Posted July 22, 2009 LOL, I often wonder if a three digit IQ might not be a good requirement for the purchase of any kind of firearm. Quote
T_O_A_D Posted July 22, 2009 Posted July 22, 2009 Nice BA I've always wanted one too, nearly bought a Kimber once, but elected for a cheaper glock. I don't play with it, it just stays in the ready is all. Quote
T_O_A_D Posted July 22, 2009 Posted July 22, 2009 Nice BA I've always wanted one too, nearly bought a Kimber once, but elected for a cheaper glock. I don't play with it, it just stays in the ready is all. Quote
BadAim Posted July 22, 2009 Author Posted July 22, 2009 ~S~ BA M8, "I shot steel plate competitively for a couple of years, and nearly won one match." So not "Bad Aim" then ?? LOL ~S~ Brainless The first Photo is my qualification target for the LFI 1 course (Leathal Force Institute) I missed 1 question on the written exam (a stupid misread), so I got 'only' a 99 overall. The second is from the ASAA basic course (American Small Arms Academy) I got an 87 overall, good enough for a 'distinguished graduate' rating. The 87 was hard earned on a cold and damp November weekend, after putting 500 rounds through a pistol that's hard on the hands after 50. Yeah, I can shoot some. I only wish it translated to WWII aircraft on the computer. Quote
BadAim Posted July 22, 2009 Author Posted July 22, 2009 ~S~ BA M8, "I shot steel plate competitively for a couple of years, and nearly won one match." So not "Bad Aim" then ?? LOL ~S~ Brainless The first Photo is my qualification target for the LFI 1 course (Leathal Force Institute) I missed 1 question on the written exam (a stupid misread), so I got 'only' a 99 overall. The second is from the ASAA basic course (American Small Arms Academy) I got an 87 overall, good enough for a 'distinguished graduate' rating. The 87 was hard earned on a cold and damp November weekend, after putting 500 rounds through a pistol that's hard on the hands after 50. Yeah, I can shoot some. I only wish it translated to WWII aircraft on the computer. Quote
BadAim Posted July 22, 2009 Author Posted July 22, 2009 Nice BA I've always wanted one too, nearly bought a Kimber once, but elected for a cheaper glock. I don't play with it, it just stays in the ready is all. My first handgun was a Glock 19. I still consider it to be one of the finest handguns made. I call it "the shovel that shoots bullets" it is as accurate as is necessary, as reliable as, well... a shovel, and pretty much indestructible (no really.... Chuck Taylor has been trying to destroy one for years. Last time I heard the score is Glock: 170,000 rounds - Chuck Taylor: Still the owner of a working Glock.) I'd still own it but the combination of the funky ass grip angle and the crappy trigger causes my carpal tunnel to act up.....I couldn't even dry fire the thing towards the end. As for the Kimber, you'll note the little CDP in the photo's in my previous post....I'll let the photos speak for themselves. Quote
BadAim Posted July 22, 2009 Author Posted July 22, 2009 Nice BA I've always wanted one too, nearly bought a Kimber once, but elected for a cheaper glock. I don't play with it, it just stays in the ready is all. My first handgun was a Glock 19. I still consider it to be one of the finest handguns made. I call it "the shovel that shoots bullets" it is as accurate as is necessary, as reliable as, well... a shovel, and pretty much indestructible (no really.... Chuck Taylor has been trying to destroy one for years. Last time I heard the score is Glock: 170,000 rounds - Chuck Taylor: Still the owner of a working Glock.) I'd still own it but the combination of the funky ass grip angle and the crappy trigger causes my carpal tunnel to act up.....I couldn't even dry fire the thing towards the end. As for the Kimber, you'll note the little CDP in the photo's in my previous post....I'll let the photos speak for themselves. Quote
Streak Posted July 23, 2009 Posted July 23, 2009 Nice shoot'n tex. As for me. I gave in to temptation last weekend & bought a 1930 manufacture Mossin Nagant 91/30. She's in nice condition & has the octagon receiver. Now I just need to find someone who wants to buy the 1944 manufacture, round receiver, MN 91/30 that I already had. Quote
Streak Posted July 23, 2009 Posted July 23, 2009 Nice shoot'n tex. As for me. I gave in to temptation last weekend & bought a 1930 manufacture Mossin Nagant 91/30. She's in nice condition & has the octagon receiver. Now I just need to find someone who wants to buy the 1944 manufacture, round receiver, MN 91/30 that I already had. Quote
1. DDz Quorum Painless Posted July 23, 2009 1. DDz Quorum Posted July 23, 2009 ~S~ BA, Most impressive M8. You and JP really should get together ..... what with you being a good shot and JP being an excellent target !!! LMAO ~S~ Heartless. Quote
1. DDz Quorum Painless Posted July 23, 2009 1. DDz Quorum Posted July 23, 2009 ~S~ BA, Most impressive M8. You and JP really should get together ..... what with you being a good shot and JP being an excellent target !!! LMAO ~S~ Heartless. Quote
JensenPark Posted July 23, 2009 Posted July 23, 2009 ~S~ BA, Most impressive M8. You and JP really should get together ..... what with you being a good shot and JP being an excellent target !!! LMAO ~S~ Heartless. LOL...good one Mick...good one. Quote
JensenPark Posted July 23, 2009 Posted July 23, 2009 ~S~ BA, Most impressive M8. You and JP really should get together ..... what with you being a good shot and JP being an excellent target !!! LMAO ~S~ Heartless. LOL...good one Mick...good one. Quote
BadAim Posted July 24, 2009 Author Posted July 24, 2009 As for me. I gave in to temptation last weekend & bought a 1930 manufacture Mossin Nagant 91/30. She's in nice condition & has the octagon receiver. Now I just need to find someone who wants to buy the 1944 manufacture, round receiver, MN 91/30 that I already had. I think you need both for...er.....historical reasons, yeah, that's it. Historical. Quote
.png.3326d5bbcb89fe2bcd3937259933ad13.png)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.