Off the back of CGs thread about the new SB i-series Intel processors, I thought I'd kick this one off to cover the mainboards.
As I understand it, the question is which chipset? There are two new ones, the H67 and the P67. Apparently the H67 is 'locked' to limit (prevent?) overclocking, but takes advantage of the HD graphics gubbins built in to the processors, whereas the P67 is 'unlocked' for the overclockers, but doesn't use the graphics.
This means that you could save money if you're not bothered about overclocking by going for the 2600 as opposed to the 2600K (the 'K' denotes unlocked) and get a board with the H67 chipset (also cheaper). Question is how much difference does using the graphics stuff built into the processor make? or is it better to get the unlocked hardware and clock the machine to get an overall boost.
What do you think?