FoolTrottel

The mod is now installed on our OpenBeta server.

You're a year late in that case. Or need to wait a few more. (Does that Mod need to be installed on the Dserver?)

Nice ... but ... does it allow 20 seconds?

15/01/45 Walter Moore Air: 1x Ju-88A4 Ground: 1x Houwitzer, 1x Automobile bridge (no automobiles were hurt or damaged in the process)

Interested.

13/1/1945 Walter Moore Ground: A strand of 78.5 Yards of disturbed ground and molten snow 150 yards short of the runway of Strassfeld airfield. (For the third time in a row failed to protect my leader. I am hopeless in cloud, can read the instruments fine, as in able to conclude 'this no good' just in time under control to not auger in ... lost an aileron in the process. Got shot up a bit, then a bit some more where it was not a good idea to try and land on wheels ... Oh well)

I see no reason why it would not work... We can setup any channel on our Public TS, if it's all known before hand it would be easy. We can assign rights to one of them to create channels... but would be better if they are created before the match, so people can test, and setup whispers and test... (Or would you even want to go as far as assigning passwords to channels?)

Good idea and suggestions... This indicates we will all be going multi-crew? And a crew member can only talk to his tank crew? That's very complex to realize. First we need to know the entire tank-line up, like who is in what tank. And then stick to it. No crew changes... I tend to think to keep TS open for all tank crew, and try and add discipline to it - radio silence and only the relevant bits being communicated - for example, the commander calls out the target, the gunner then looks for it and kills it. He and does not go "looking looking looking looking... got it .. .about to fire... Fire!"... but silently goes looking for it, and fires a shell at it, or call out 'negative, can't see it' - It's obvious for him to go look for it, and aim at it and shoot it... no need to call all that out! We'd lose a lot in flexibility if we set it up per tank. Like what if we need to switch to taking individual tanks? Or if we need to re-arrange the crews due to someone having technical or RL issues? Move people in TS channels during the game running? Hm... Separate the comms between air and ground: All for it. We need that. But we do not need if one spare signalers, if one is down, he can still relay the messages - he may not be in a tank/ac, but he will still be on TS. That should work okay. Unless we say we do not want that immersion wise? For sure, it will depend on numbers joining, but I feel they will be such that we can cope on two channels, air and ground, and whispers in between 'm. What we've learned from the P38 campaign, is that 8 geezers in a channel that are on the same objective can and will work. More is tricky, and mixing objectives... nasty! Maybe look at it that way: Split tank crews comms in task forces/units, going for a specific objective? Hm. Yeah. What if objective is done? Then there's this: For me, separating the channels has a huge downside regarding the fun factor. As in - if I'm in a tank as a gunner, and I am unable to hear what others are doing or experiencing, it come close to being in a small single player/crew mission, with nobody else in it...

Our DCS Stable server has been updated.

12/1/1945 Walter Moore Air: 109K4 Ground: 2x Barge

Fun fact: Just realized this wind mill is a movie star!

But this model has Zero bhp... I just pushed the prop, got it spinning, then quickly started video recording on the iPhone - it does run nicely for a thing running without any baring, so that's how I got time to point the camera and start recording after swinging it

Define 'fly' ... (I do live three stories up... no problem to test it, if you really want me to? Oh wait, it's dark, it's got no lights, so cannot do... )

IMG_0605.mp4

The 'Bolwerksmolen' in the Netherlands.

9/1/1945 Walter Moore Air: Shared He-111 with Zukker and Jabo Ground: 3x AAA Guns 1x Transport Truck 2x Parked a/c (Ju88) 1x Barge

Oh my... I remember them flying low over my home town, back in the eighties... they were so darn LOUD!!

Yeah, sorry, I should've thought about that as well ... Oh well, maybe next time ... ?

3. It's not a Boeing P12-E!

Great mission ... thanks Fenrir! Had some issues with trim, meaning, the way I have it setup right now is not good, fighting it all the way.. Updating the beta right now... should be better then, I hope. And there's the graphics, in the dark ... I took these screenshots... First one is with Gamma at 3.5 After I bailed out (well, you can see that flying on made no sense ) set Gamma back to 1.8 and it all looked like this: Great to fly with that many mossies though, and everything went okay - until it got dark over here ... really really really dark

Most of us are using pedals, but not all. You can get by with using twist stick me thinks. Keys for rudder not so much

Hello Hawkeye, welcome here! Yes, we do fly with Complex Engine management mode enabled.

08/01/1945 Walter Moore Air claims: None! Ground claims: One Bridge, One AA gun. (Edit: The bridge was up in the air though, as in, well, high over the river. One could argue it's not a ground object ...)

Suits me fine.

Not sure if I can handle the two full hours, but for sure willing to give it a go! I'd like to pilot a Mossie, with the option of switching to a navigator position on a different Mossie, should mine run into some kind of engine or radio troubles