From what I have read, taking Moscow would have dealt a massive (killing?) blow because of the rail systems...
everything came through Moscow as a hub.
what do you guys think was a bigger disaster for the Germans:
Stalingrad or Kursk?
Yea, they lost basically the entire 6th as Stalingrad...but was the stupidity of carrying through with Zitadelle a bigger blunder/disaster especially considering they must have know the Soviets knew exactly where they were attacking.
If they had gone the route I think Manstein wanted...or attacked in May as originally planned instead of waiting for the Panther...
I can't imagine the Germans could still have won against the combined Allies - but what would the outcome have been if they had taken a different route and not basically thrown away all those tanks/planes/troops bashing their head against the wall at Kursk.
Today, I was honoured to host Dubbo and BeeBop of the Hellhounds for lunch today at the ol' Hotel.
Dubbo, for those in the unawares, was the (goof?) person who came up with the DangerDogz tag.